This comes up occasionally in different groups, that WhatsApp is not safe because its not private. So hey let's all go talk on Signal or Telegram or Discord or... Out of all of these, I think Signal is the one that doesn't store the messages and is encrypted end to end, but, there still is one big gaping hole in this strategy.... a human.
To put it simply, anyone you send a message, they can post, re-post, send to all their contacts, screen shot, etc. Once you press send, its in the public domain.
One example of this is the story of Claire Swire... for all you millennials, you never heard of her, but for us who were present at the dawn of the email age, she was legend. Her email, sent in private to her then boyfriend, traveled the world and started up a search that defined the times. Cue nostalgic music....
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/under-the-yum-yum-tree/
Lets just say put the kids to bed before you read this....
That said, there is another issue too that Rob Braxman (the Internet Privacy Guy) lays out in his video below, basically, your meta data, and your contact list. Clever sleuths and the alphabet agencies will be able to identity you with these, even if they can't see the messages themselves.
https://odysee.com/@RobBraxmanTech:6/signal-unsafe:7
So sorry everyone, nothing you send on the internet is truly private, and you might as well imagine what you are writing will end up on the front page of the NYT or WaPo.
Trying out something new, a video message.
Also to back this up is a good article from Glen Greenwald about how our capacity to reason diminishes during the highly charged climate surrounding a war and war propaganda from BOTH sides.
You can catch Robert Barns on his locals platform at
Welcome to the Nomads Locals Page, connecting all who attended 2021 nomads conference and those who ascribe to Andrew Henderson's "Go Where You Are Treated Best"
We highly recommend to subscribe to Andrew's You Tube channel here:
https://www.youtube.com/c/nomadcapitalist/videos
Note: This site is NOT affiliated directly with Nomad Capitalist, but we support his ideals and hope to foster many nomads in a vibrant and free community!
You would have to be living under a rock to not have heard about AI. Artificial Intelligence, either the great savior of human kind, or the precursor to Sky-net that will destroy us all. Which is it?
First of all, this post was NOT written by AI. So apologies for any mistakes. There is a confusion in terms I believe, as most of the AI's people are thinking of (ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, etc.) are really LLM or Large Language Models. These are not really "intelligent" but just using mathematics to predict what words are needed to complete the question. Which is why people say AI "lies" too much. Not really, its just predicting words that complete the query and has no concept of what even lying really is.
So is it a bubble? Is it the next industrial revolution? This is the question of the day, and to help answer it, let me point to a few videos that have just been released that give relevant information:
All-In Podcast from 29th of May, 2026 see's a very pro-AI panel debate on if the layoffs in ...
Michael Saylor shared something recently that may have gone unnoticed by most.... he said it in an interview with Tom Bilyeu recently.... here is the clip:
https://x.com/TheBTCTherapist/status/1869507247526793481
MICHAEL SAYLOR: The first nation to print their own currency to buy Bitcoin wins.
Paul from invest answers then also put together the fact that MSTR is applying to issue more stock to buy more BTC.... is that the same thing? Basically, people will be using fiat to buy stock that will be used to purchase BTC. But the BTC supply is limited.... so get your MSTR (or your BTC) soon! (NOT financial advice....)
But this is not what Satoshi's original 2008 whitepaper (https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper) had in mind when it developed Bitcoin, it was suppose to be a peer to peer cashless transaction system, right?
Roger Ver thinks so, and wrote a book about it called Hijacking Bitcoin. This video is a summary of that book ...
